Celestia (TIA)

I will discuss what we should pay attention to when “accumulating altcoins from the bottom” during correction phases in the cryptocurrency market.

Instead of focusing on altcoins that you intuitively think will bring asymmetric wealth in the future, you should concentrate on altcoins that meet certain criteria and properly balance your portfolio.

1- FDV and inflation

Moving away from the unit illusion (coins with massive zeros), you should first look at the fundamental working architecture of projects and the activity of developers.

The reason is simple; a project with active developers and a good architecture is both more inclined to create something new and greatly increases the chance of making money. Put yourself in the shoes of a large-cap holder: would you fund a project with no development, or one that constantly works and renews itself?

Here the most important detail is the tokenomics structure. If the circulating supply is excessively leveraged compared to the total supply, the project may face serious inflation problems. Moreover, if the locked supply consists mainly of large VC funds, that adds extra risk; the biggest examples are $TIA and $ARB.

2- Revenue model

I think this is the most important point, and it’s something I’ve been talking about a lot for the past 5‑6 months. Friends, regardless of price, a project or protocol must be making money. It's very simple and clear. If you don’t even want to work a job that your salary can’t cover, a project that doesn’t earn money can’t benefit anyone.

Therefore the revenue model must be solid and should give a share to investors. Again, empathize: if a successful company gives employees extra bonuses, those employees take more ownership and work harder. The same logic applies: if a project makes money and you are an investor, you won’t even want to sell when you get support, you’ll want to provide even more support.

Thus the projects that make money will share that money with investors. There is no other way.

3- Exit liquidity

In the cases where the FDV/market‑cap leverage I mentioned in the first point is high, the key is to see who holds the supply. If the project owner and VCs dominate, an exit pump will leave the rest with a painful loss.

If the distribution among supporters and investors is relatively even, the overall pricing depends on the community and the market. You need to make a good distinction here to avoid exit liquidity problems.

4- Did it survive? Did it not?

One of the most important points for me is whether the project survived crises like the one on October 10, previous years’ crises, or even hacks that the project itself suffered.

Can it continue operating and stay alive?

Because a project that gets through one crisis becomes stronger, and a project that survives multiple crises has solved many issues. If it also makes money during that time, we can say it has succeeded.

$AAVE, for example, saw its price drop and was hacked, yet it is still running, still has large holders, and people are still making money.

Of course, besides these, meme coins, shitcoins, and other coins with potential stories should also be in the portfolio. However, it is now time to build a balanced portfolio. We can no longer create such a large risk imbalance in the cryptocurrency market.

$TIA C& H . If the formation works, we will go to the main resistance above, then moon mission https://t.co/RVByvTS6CR

This video idea came to me. Top 200 biggest disappointments among the altcoins I have bought.

I mentioned a few in the last YouTube video.

For you, what is the biggest disappointment among alts? I'll start with a short list in the first comment: