5.9K @0xMrBeefman [Update] $ZINC 1.58M
zinc155BS4mSPk8GXQj4R5hkVDQXcW253pTYq5SGyfi
Looking more and more like @Arcium doesn't need ZINC anymore since the tech demo is done
Don't see resources going into pushing $ZINC as a project any further
> My Meteora LP entry
Print is fading hard and the chart's showing weakness
Sometimes I test the print with a minimal allocation
5.9K @0xMrBeefman [Update] $ZINC 3.15M
zinc155BS4mSPk8GXQj4R5hkVDQXcW253pTYq5SGyfi
One of my takes was that this token will be held afloat since @Arcium release is coming soon, and it's a quite serious project judging by its partnerships
But TGE on June 22 already happened and right now there's no acute need to support ZINC. But this is just one of the takes, a guess, nothing more
Onchain distro is also hard to analyze since this isn't a regular memcoin but a technological project
Protocol still generates revenue if you trust the data from defilama.
Although specifically right now the chart looks very weak
> My Meteora LP Setup
Most likely will reenter the position soon. Allow for increased trading volume on this dump
5
1
2.0K
6.7K @0xVaha 6.7K @0xVaha . @zinc_cash history page broke down net emission per round, went back through a few and they're all negative
so the buyback engine is pulling out more than what's getting emitted each round, supply's actually shrinking not just flat
still working out what that means longer term but the mechanism's clearly working as intended
38
5
756
6.7K @0xVaha . @zinc_cash history page broke down net emission per round, went back through a few and they're all negative
so the buyback engine is pulling out more than what's getting emitted each round, supply's actually shrinking not just flat
still working out what that means longer term but the mechanism's clearly working as intended
38
5
756
