Drift protocol (DRIFT)

Lada moment @DriftProtocol is set to restart the old app/website after a redesign/audit. Funds from IF are expected to return; the rest is still unknown when. Also check @circle and the update on Monday. Maybe that's why $DRIFT is reacting? 🤔 I don't have DRIFT, I only farm DRIFT/SOL. DYOR: low liquidity. https://t.co/xn1gP9XUDI

Lazarus spent 6 months doing in-person social engineering on Drift. $285M drained in 12 minutes. $577M total via human-layer attacks in 2026.

Pira, Drift operations suspended due to a security incident https://t.co/sPL3O7XV8K https://t.co/qPuzTEjbxF

It turns out Drift is in fact not invincible https://t.co/z8EKm2H6k7

Some insights from @artemis’s 1-month DEX/perp DEX token performance: • Solana DEX tokens (DRIFT, ORCA, JUP, RAY) avg: -37.2% • ETH-side DEX tokens (UNI, CRV, GMX, SNX, AERO) avg: -25.8% • HYPE: +48.2% - only name in the green The market is getting selective. Real fees, real volume, a token model that actually captures value. Hyperliquid is in a different category.

An Open Letter To @DriftProtocol In therapy, people are often told to write a letter to their abuser. Of course, they’re also usually told not to send it. But this is CT, and people like to read things. I fell in love with Drift after 10/10. Watching the entire industry get liquidated over price action that wasn’t real forced me to take a serious look at anyone trying to solve that problem. And at the time, Drift looked like one of the only teams actually trying. You didn’t liquidate most users that day. Your approach to protecting traders from temporary price dislocation events felt like a breath of fresh air and a much needed step in the right direction for this industry. So I put my eggs in your basket. Partly because of PTSD. Partly because of one feature. And partly because after suffering one of the biggest liquidation losses in an event where nearly two million other traders were wiped out too...I probably wasn’t thinking clearly. But what hurt more than the abused trust was the social capital I burned defending you. Supporting Drift was not a popular move. At the time, my reputation in this space had not taken any real hits. And I stuck my neck out for you because I thought I was taking a principled stand on industry progress. In hindsight, I was putting too much faith in one feature and ignoring the broader risk. That’s on me. But what happened next is on you. I do not blame North Korea. I blame Drift. This was not a smart contract exploit. This was not some obscure bug that slipped through an audit. This was human failure. Operational failure. Negligence. In any other industry, if a key individual acted negligently and that negligence caused a major loss of customer funds, that person would be removed. If it were a founder or CEO, there would be a resignation. There would be accountability. Here? Nothing. No public statement that the responsible keyholder stepped down. No confirmation that they were removed. No meaningful acknowledgment that the person trusted with those controls should never be trusted with them again. That lack of accountability is an insult to every victim of your negligence. The idea that a business can mishandle admin controls, lose customer funds, and then move forward without individual-level accountability is absurd. And the insult didn’t stop there. You floated the idea that token holders staked in the DSM might forfeit their tokens. You even suggested putting it to a vote. That was not what people signed up for. This was not a normal bad debt scenario. This was not the type of event that was clearly covered under the terms people accepted when they staked. You tried to rewrite the rules after the fact. And those tokens are still not released. Stop pretending you’re DeFi while holding token holders’ property hostage. Then came the illusion of a recovery path. The Tether revenue-backed loan made for a nice PR headline. It created the appearance of movement. But it was based on revenue. Revenue you don’t have. Even at pre-exploit levels, it would have taken years to make victims only partially whole. This was not a major bug that needed to be patched. This was human error and protocol-level negligence in how admin controls were handled. And yet you stall. Your updates are infrequent. The ones you do post are mostly vapor. You are not waiting because you have no choice. You are waiting because it is a strategy. You are counting on crypto having a short memory. You are waiting for market optimism to return. You are waiting for the exploit to become old news. You are waiting for a dozen newer exploits to bury yours. I won’t let you forget. You are finished, and you know it. Drift once had a guaranteed place in the Solana ecosystem because traders had very few native alternatives. That is no longer true. Solana traders who don’t want peer-vs-pool exposure have choices now. You are no longer essential. You are no longer inevitable. And without real accountability, you will never be trusted the same way again. You’re hoping people forget. I won’t. And until you show actual accountability, I won’t let anyone else forget either. If tokens are going to be forfeited, start with the team allocation. Start with the people responsible. Start with the insiders who created the conditions for this failure. Public resignations would be a start. You don’t have to name names. But a public statement saying the person responsible no longer controls what they were clearly unfit to control would be nice. Put your own money into making users whole. Stop hiding behind process. Stop pretending this was just another unfortunate crypto exploit. It wasn’t. It was negligence. I can do a good enough job embarrassing myself from time to time without any help. But Drift embarrassed me. And you should be ashamed. More than you are. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

Drift is pushing to restart the platform after the April attack https://t.co/SCzpWqj0Lf https://t.co/4OhqAC5v41