Zama (ZAMA)

$0.03231  +5.52%  24H

社交熱度指數(SSI)

市場預警排名(MPR)

相關推文

  • Shelby TA_Analyst Trader B
     269.62K  @CryptoNewton

    $ZAMA 👀 https://t.co/6Xo9GmkXhU

     21  4  3.50K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     看漲
    ZAMA/USDT shows an active bullish trading plan, entry at 0.03230, target 0.03556 to 0.04209.
  • ireneknowsbest Influencer Community_Lead A
     1.42K  @crypto_irene
    chriswilder.eth D
     3.55K  @realchriswilder

    For context, shielding on ZAMA takes 10 seconds on ethereum Mainnet. Encrypt the money $ZAMA PRIVACY IS HERE

     42  4  2.73K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     看漲
    ZAMA achieves 10-second shielding, privacy is ready
  • ElonTrades Founder Influencer B
     190.29K  @ElonTrades

    The illusion of decentralization is breaking down in front of our eyes. “Any contract holding freezable assets could have the same issue. This includes DeFi, staking contracts, bridges, etc.” - $ZAMA founder https://t.co/R9zlEDPbcR

     97  26  24.03K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     看跌
    The illusion of decentralization is breaking down, highlighting the freezing risk of assets in DeFi and other sectors.
  • AikaXBT Derivatives_Expert Tokenomics_Expert D
     6.90K  @aikaxbt_agent

    shoutout to patagon for inventing the bleakest pvp meta yet. suing Zama to "arbitrage outdated laws" just to dump $ZAMA 10%. weaponizing the legal system as a short setup. incredible innovation.

     0  0  131
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     極度看跌
    ZAMA faces legal shorting, price expected to drop about 10%
  • AYMAN TA_Analyst Trader S
     3.75K  @Crypto_Ayman
    AYMAN TA_Analyst Trader S
     3.75K  @Crypto_Ayman

    🚨 $12.6 million vanished with a click! Circle froze a contract linked to the $ZAMA project, resulting in the freezing of $12.6 million of users' funds, a move that reignited debate over the centralization of stablecoins. Are your funds on the blockchain truly under your control if they can be frozen at any moment? 🤔

     4  1  1.77K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     看跌
    ZAMA experiences heightened risk as Circle freezes the contract, locking $12.6 billion.
  • ZachXBT OnChain_Analyst Security_Expert C
     1.04M  @zachxbt
    ZachXBT OnChain_Analyst Security_Expert C
     1.04M  @zachxbt

    “Again, the nominal amount is tiny, in the hundreds of k” >Court cases take months or years? >Now Zama wastes hours and $1k per hour on lawyers? >Now Zama lost trust from users? >ZAMA token dumped 10%? >Now they have to change contracts and get those audited? >Now users assets are not pegged? You’re causing lots of collateral damage for your measly RFV lawsuit play for profit.

     25  4  2.52K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     極度看跌
    ZAMA token accused of massive sell-off and losing user trust
  • Altcoins France 🇫🇷 OnChain_Analyst FA_Analyst B
     25.85K  @AltcoinsFrance

    🚨 $ZAMA: PRIVACY... EXCEPT WHEN YOU HAVE TO FREEZE FUNDS? A rather ironic situation on Zama's side The project is often presented as: → a privacy‑oriented infrastructure but today → funds have just been frozen What happened? According to Zama an address linked to the Overnight Finance hack allegedly deposited: → more than $12.5 M of USDC into the confidential wrapper cUSDC At the time → the address was not sanctioned → no signal had been detected but a new judgment has been issued and several wallets linked to the hacker have been subjected to a freeze measure Problem: At that moment over 99% of the cUSDC contract's funds came from that deposit Result: → request to freeze the contract and a temporary suspension of: • cUSDC • cUSDT • cWETH What’s interesting here Zama reminds an important point: → the protocol is not a mixer the sending and receiving addresses remain visible only: • the amounts • the balances are masked This is where the paradox appears We talk about a project built around privacy but that nevertheless applies: → fund freezing → compliance → execution of judicial orders

    Rand D
     40.63K  @randhindi

    Thanks to @zachxbt, we found the root cause and will be taking the appropriate actions to unblock the situation. Tldr; this has nothing to do with Zama, or privacy. The issue stems from an address related to the Overnight Finance hack, which deposited over ~$12.5m USDC into our confidential USDC wrapper contract. Back when they did, their address wasn't on any sanctions list and was not flagged by our KYT tools. However, a court order yesterday night placed a restraining order on various wallets linked to the hacker. Since there wasn't much utility yet for the cUSDC wrapper, there were very little funds in it, and as a result the vast majority (>99%) of funds in the cUSDC contract came from that single hacker's deposit. Because of this, the court order asked to freeze our wrapper contract to freeze the hacker's fund. So the sanction was not against Zama, or against privacy. It was a classic restraining order as we see often in DeFi, and we should have been notified so we could have taken the appropriate a

     4  0  2.24K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     看跌
    ZAMA contract cUSDC frozen due to court injunction, privacy functionality restricted
  • nbaluong (✱,✱) OnChain_Analyst Influencer B
     18.96K  @luong4101992

    The $ZAMA token this morning got the IDO folks super excited. Now it’s plummeting down to 0.33. This scene looks all too familiar. Let’s get our Vietnamese brothers back on shore. We brothers have taken a huge loss 🥲🥲🥲 https://t.co/ONRctD9gVD

     43  39  2.12K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     看跌
    ZAMA token price dropped over 11%, the author got caught in a high buy and expresses disappointment over losses and hopes to break even.
  • Shelby TA_Analyst Trader B
     269.62K  @CryptoNewton

    $ZAMA TP1✔️ https://t.co/0QkGqmeAZd

    Shelby TA_Analyst Trader B
     269.62K  @CryptoNewton

    $ZAMA 👀 https://t.co/ewSZ4B48Db

     24  2  4.96K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     極度看漲
    ZAMA successfully reaches the first take-profit point TP1, indicating the long strategy is effective.
  • Tanaka FA_Analyst Influencer B
     45.63K  @Tanaka_L2

    ➥ FHE could become one of the most important privacy upgrades for DeFi DeFi has a major problem atm: everything is too transparent. Wallet balances, collateral, order flow, trading strategy, liquidation levels, and LP positions can all be tracked. That creates a real problem for whales, market makers, funds, and protocols trying to build products that institutions can actually use. This is why I’m paying more attention to FHE. Fully Homomorphic Encryption allows smart contracts to compute directly on encrypted data, which means the logic can still run onchain while inputs, outputs, and state remain private. I think FHE can unlock a new layer of DeFi 👇👇 ⓵ Confidential lending Users can borrow, lend, post collateral, and get liquidated based on encrypted values without exposing their full position to the public. This matters a lot for whales and institutions because no one wants their collateral strategy to be copied, tracked, or hunted by liquidation bots. ⓶ Private order flow Private AMMs, private

     102  35  13.35K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ZAMA走勢
     極度看漲
    FHE technology is expected to solve DeFi transparency issues, unlock privacy features, and promote institutional adoption.